by Duluth News Tribune
October 26, 2012 at 7:00 pm in Duluth News Tribune
Vote no: Reject carpetbaggers and their campaign of fear, racism
Tags: columnists, columns, Editorials, elections, Minnesota, Opinion, Politics 1 Comment »
i have noticed that letter writers that are debating for no on either and/or both amendments use far better reasoning and logic to back up their arguements whereas the letter writers that are for the amendments use faith (which requires the absence of proof by its very definition) and argue for a solution to a problem that hasnt been proven sufficient enough to justify implementing the costly solution in the first place. A solution whose details have been left open for manipulation after the vote and that restricts voting rights and will be another cost burden on the tax payer.
Like or Dislike: 7 4
Click here to cancel reply.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
To start connecting please log in first. You can also create an account.
Topics is proudly provided by the Forum Communications Company