Dangers of sulfide mining being swept under the rug
December 15, 2011 at 6:00 pm in Duluth News Tribune
According to Friends of the Boundary Waters, sulfide mining has “caused environmental and financial problems all over the world.” The group states this type of mining contaminates drinking water and destroys fish and wildlife habitats. Oftentimes, sulfide-mining companies go bankrupt, leaving local taxpayers with millions of dollars in clean-up costs.
Continue Reading

The science of he ‘EPA’, that’s a new one!
“Land of 10,000 Lakes” is just a silly motto developed by the DNR for there own protection.
These motto’s and saying’s are like a “cloaking device” for the USFS & the DNR so they can go about their daily routines and continue to be payed.
The DNR,, is this states,, hugest tax burden,,, and they operate without ‘checks & balances’.
No accountability!
I feel that they are like ‘leeches’,,, sucking us dry.
The article forgot to mention the Scotty Walker recall.
He is a ‘Boogy Man’ too, just like PolyMet.
They are out to get you !!!
Hot debate. What do you think?
18
21
Oh ya, dat silly motto stuff, and who needs science to tell us anything when you can just open the screen door a bit to no all you need about da outsides.
Hot debate. What do you think?
14
20
Move to Amend is one of these anti-business groups that are obsessed with limiting the scope of the 1st amendment.
A corporation is a VOLUNTARY association of PEOPLE. Yes business IS PEOPLE. No it is not the evil boogie man you imagine it to be in your socialist fever dreams.
Hot debate. What do you think?
24
18
The laughable “Manooman”(wild rice) movement that Donny’s little brother seems to be motivated by is a farce. In an article on dflduluthexposed(dot)com, the truth comes out that the closest Indian “reservation” to the Polymet project is 27 miles away and 1.6 miles in size–you got it, it is a casino.
What this comes down to is a tiny group of Socialists who only believe in Govt money, not in business. If they had their way, there would be no mining in Minnesota at all, and they would be happy to have workers on welfare.
Shame on Nathan Ness for pushing for Minnesota poverty and foisting false canards.
Hot debate. What do you think?
24
16