Topics

3 Comments

1. 
   Buffalo Bill said: On November 26, 2011 at 7:49 AM

   Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

   We went to Fargo so we could do some real shopping. Today we are headed to Bismarck for more of the same.

   Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: 9  23

   Log in to Reply
2. 
   Fred Brown said: On November 27, 2011 at 7:18 AM

   Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

   I see the paper just had to get in a bash about Fargo being “horrible”. Yea, right. Fargo had way better bargains and a much better selection and 100 times the number of stores.

   By “horrible”, I’m assuming this gal meant there were a lot of people in Fargo, which I’m sure there were. No one shops Jamestown. Period. There is absolutely nothing when it comes to stores.

   You won’t see me Christmas shopping in Jamestown.

   Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: 6  25

   Log in to Reply
• 
  Fred Brown said: On November 27, 2011 at 8:58 AM

  Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

  The more I think about it, this story is just laughable.

  Only Jamestown would spin a story that Fargo, packed with shoppers spending money is bad, and a much less crowded Jamestown, with less shoppers spending less money is good.

  I bet if you asked any retailer, they would tell you they would prefer the Fargo size crowds to the substantially smaller Jamestown crowds.

  The Jamestown spin continues.

  Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: 4  26

  Log in to Reply