Kloppenburg requests recount
April 20, 2011 at 12:03 pm in River Falls Journal
Wisconsin News
Assistant Attorney General JoAnne Kloppenburg has requested a statewide recount of the ballots cast in the Supreme Court election 15 days ago. She also asked the Government Accountability Board to have a special investigator look into the actions of Waukesha County Clerk Kathy Nickolaus.
Continue Reading
Good grief! What a waste of the taxpayers’ money! There is no way she can pick up 7300 + votes in a recount.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
36 
9
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
9 
30
Talk about someone having ZERO experience! Look no further than the oval office.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
30 
8
You can say she has the right to request the recount, but come on! There’s no way she’ll gain enough votes to overcome that huge of lead. Unless they steal the election like Franken-stein did in MN.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
31 
7
PLEASE tell me she has to pay for this herself, since it doesn’t fall within the “margin” the state recognizes for an automatic recount.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
22 
6
@Kodiak; unfortunately, we the taxpayers are STUCK with the bill. They wanted Prosser to concede when she only had a 204 vote lead after the “unofficial” election night count. Now the lead is “officially” over 7000 and she won’t concede and let it go? But I guess on the other hand, if the shoe was on the other foot, I’m sure Prosser would let the process run it’s course. Regardless, it won’t change the outcome of this race.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
23 
6
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
6 
18
Yes….even though she is behind by more than 7,000 votes. Just another fine example of common sense. Instead of admitting defeat (when it’s VERY obvious), lets demand a recount and have the taxpayers pay for that too. What a near-sighted liberal nut-job.
Like or Dislike:
16 
6
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
3 
17
How about this? You’re ignorant. When a victory (for EITHER side) is this definite, the taxpayers should NOT have to pay for a frivolous recount.
Like or Dislike:
13 
3
Oh ouch…
Like or Dislike:
1 
9