As others see it: Aiding wolf delisting
December 19, 2010 at 6:00 pm in Worthington Daily Globe
The effort to delist the gray wolf in Minnesota took a step forward last week, thanks to U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar, DFL-Minn. Continue Reading
As others see it: Aiding wolf delisting
6 Comments
Klobuchar and Franken as far as that goes, are both still voting with the Dem leadership no matter what their constituents want. They both had to know that the vast majority of citizens, like 80%, were against the amnesty dream act but voted for it anyway. Now she wants to kill off the Gray Wolf, while wanting to reward illegal acts at the same time. I don’t want people like that representing me. They will get no support or vote form me! They evidently didn’t here the people in the last election but they will in the next!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Yes I agree and thanks to Amy and Franken:
December 1, 2010
Minnesota Senators Al Franken and Amy Klobuchar co-sponsored S 510, also known as the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act. The bill passed the Senate on Tuesday, but now a constitutional question has risen as the House contemplates not accepting the bill.
Section 107 of this legislation includes new taxes. The problem is that Article 1, Section 7 of the U.S. Constitution says that “All bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.†In other words, bills raising revenue of any kind cannot originate in the Senate, like the FDA legislation passed yesterday.
Did Klobuchar and Franken knowingly sponsor a bill they knew to be unconstitutional? Were they even aware there existed items that created revenue in their own bill? Did they read the bill? If so, why would they let a clearly unconstitutional bill go forth?
YEP, they knew!
OPEN, HONEST and Change you can believe in?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
December 1, 2010
Minnesota Senators Al Franken and Amy Klobuchar co-sponsored S 510, also known as the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act. The bill passed the Senate on Tuesday, but now a constitutional question has risen as the House contemplates not accepting the bill.
Section 107 of this legislation includes new taxes. The problem is that Article 1, Section 7 of the U.S. Constitution says that “All bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.†In other words, bills raising revenue of any kind cannot originate in the Senate, like the FDA legislation passed yesterday.
Did Klobuchar and Franken knowingly sponsor a bill they knew to be unconstitutional? Were they even aware there existed items that created revenue in their own bill? Did they read the bill? If so, why would they let a clearly unconstitutional bill go forth?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
They even want to control the internet! First food control, then internet then media, (all for your safety mind you) then communism.
FCC to Vote on Internet Regulation Plan Despite Economic Warnings
Lawmakers are on high alert as the Federal Communications Commission prepares to vote on a plan to regulate the Internet despite warnings that it could choke industry investment and hurt the economy as a whole.
The five-member commission plans to unveil, and vote on, the so-called “net neutrality” proposal on Tuesday.
Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have been saying for months that Congress, not the Obama administration, should take the lead role in deciding whether and how much to police the web. But despite a brief backing-off earlier in the year, the FCC has pushed ahead with its new regulatory plan.
GUESS WHO TWO IN MN VOTED YES?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I would have to also say if this passes, those that love Obama so much better watch out what they type or view on the internet. Especially if they are not from the U.S. or worse. So much for Amy and Franken free speech. Not them, just YOU!
Don’t believe?
Walter Cronkite, in his Preface to the paperback edition of 1984 published by The New American Library, said Orwell wrote his novel as an essay on “power, how it is acquired and maintained, how those who seek it or seek to keep it tend to sacrifice anything and everything in its name.” (p. 2) That statement gives us the key: the real purpose of control is power; power over others. Knowing that political leaders seek control over us should not surprise us, for government is an evolutionary thing and usually evolves towards more control.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Thanks to her and Franken you have this to be happy about! Wait until they control total media!!
Thanks for watching that YouTube video! That will be 50 cents, please.
Sound unrealistic? It’s actually fairly likely, thanks to a ruling handed down Tuesday by the FCC that will allow Internet service providers to charge customers based on the amount of bandwidth they use. And some argue that it’s the greatest threat to freedom we face today.
Welcome to the complex world of net neutrality.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0